My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
10-06-21 v2 HD
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Joshua Schriver
Move these (2) Oxford Twp Precincts with the rest of Oxford and Addison Twp in MI46. They share one non-partisan community of interest in their single, shared school system.
Lisa
Why after many, many displeased comments on all the previous maps, have you not corrected these egregious districts that serve to dilute the voices of Pontiac voters and other communities as well? The residents of these communities will not accept the "it's too much work" answer. Commenters from Lake Orion, Oxford, Clarkston, Independence Township, Waterford, Auburn Hills, Bloomfield and Pontiac have all stated that these districts do not preserve COIs and do not represent the communities involved in any way. Fix this!
Steve Shafer
fully support this map! it keeps the city and county whole.
Lisa McGaugh
Absolutely support this map, keeping Midland County in it's entirety is a logical approach to insuring that the communities interests are best served.
Michael McGaugh
I support this map. Keeping Midland County together is pragmatic, makes sense, and is fair to the Midland County voters.
James H. Gurnee
Fully support this map. Keep Midland together! Community interest are the same!
Jennifer Gurnee
Great! Keep Midland together, keep community interests together as one.
Richard Cesaretti
Fully support this map. Thank you for keeping Midland County whole!
Catherine A Macomber
I support this map with reservations. I believe the issues related to the Watershed that impacts northern Bay county should be considered and that area should be kept with southern Bay county
Jill Thill
Thank you for a map that keeps Midland County whole!
Dennis Quehl
I have been waiting for a map that has some common sense to it regarding community of interest. My dad said common sense is uncommon. Unfortunately there has been a lot of maps recently like 208 through 210 that seem to be politically motivated by taking a slice sideways and tearing apart Midland from Midland County. This map makes sense to us in the Midland area. Thank you for a map that ACTUALLY appears to based on community of interest and not motivated by political concerns. Thank you for a nonpartisan map that makes common sense.
Anne Van Hulle
This map looks better. It keeps Midland whole and will help in our recovery process from the floods of 2020.
Natalie Gingras Hazen
Yes!
Mary J Quehl
FINALLY A STATEHOUSE MAP THAT APPEARS TO BE MORE BASED ON COMMUNITY OF INTEREST. This map makes sense to us in the Midland area. Thank you for a map that ACTUALLY appears to based on community of interest and not motivated by political concerns. Thank you for a nonpartisen map that makes common sense.
Aaron Majorana
This is a good map because it keeps Midland whole. Midland county needs a unified voice, especially in flood recovery due to the heavy flooding that occurred here in 2020.
Mike Scott
Strong like on this map. Keeps Midland County whole!
Michelle Smith
LIKE this map- it keeps Midland and Gladwin interests for flood recovery and watershed. This is great for Midland and Central Michigan!
Matthew J Smith
LIKE this map- this makes sense and keeps Midland and Gladwin interests for flood recovery and watershed. This is great for Midland and Central Michigan, thank you
Jesseca Elza
Thank you for recognizing our community interests.
Dawn Bartell
This map makes sense. Keep midland city with midland county!
jane scott
This map makes sense. Thank you for keeping Midland County and City of Midland together!!!!! We are a community of interest!
RODNEY KLOHA
This Statehouse map makes perfect sense. Thank you for recognizing keeping the City of Midland with the County of Midland supports the important requirement of communities of interest.
David Kepler
This Map as it relates to District 31, reflects a community of interest, that is linked through the watershed the exists in that district, as well as the economic and social connections
Joseph Lunsford
This Statehouse map makes perfect sense.
Doreen F Starner
Agree with Jennifer M. Thank you!
Jennifer Majorana
This map is logical and makes sense. It harmonizes into one district communities of interest of Midland and Gladwin for flood recovery and watershed management; as well as the agricultural community of interest that benefits from representation that understands the importance of agriculture here in Midland and Central Michigan. Thank you, Commission!
Lisa
Just as bad as before. Why is a tiny slice of Union Lake and Waterford in a district with Pontiac, with whom there is no educational, social, economic or COIs, when you could include Lake Angelus (shares infrastructure and school district), Auburn Hills (COIs, schools, infrastructure), Sylvan Lake (schools/taxes) or even West Bloomfield (a large portion of Pontiac students go to school in W Bloomfield) and still not have jeopardized the VRA. Splitting up a COI and community is nothing to take lightly. Additionally, many, if not most, of these metro Detroit districts in this map split COIs, communities, are strangely shaped and have little if no common interests and will make no one happy. Not good choices; looks worse than what we have had in the past.