My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
10-06-21 v1 HD
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Joshua Schriver
Move these (2) Oxford Twp Precincts with the rest of Oxford and Addison Twp in MI46. They share one non-partisan community of interest in their single, shared school system.
Lisa
Why after many, many displeased comments on all the previous maps, have you not corrected these egregious districts that serve to dilute the voices of Pontiac voters and other communities as well? The residents of these communities will not accept the "it's too much work" answer. Commenters from Lake Orion, Oxford, Clarkston, Independence Township, Waterford, Auburn Hills, Bloomfield and Pontiac have all stated that these districts do not preserve COIs and do not represent the communities involved in any way. Fix this!
Lisa
This map unnecessarily splits multiple communities and townships. There is no VRA, COI or population requirement that necessitates this. This is pure gerrymandering.
Jason Besley
Instead of elongating district 76 so far east, why not extend east just to the natural boundary of the Grand River, then include Talmadge Township and my home of Grandville.
Then northern G.R., Grand Rapids Twp and East G.R. can comprise District 75 instead of spilling over into part of Plainfield Twp.
Steve Shafer
This keeps city and county of Midland whole but it would be more complete related to the watershed issues to include Gladwin as well. Thanks for working to keep the City and Counties of Midland together!
MARCIA BLACKSON
This is definitely better. But why not include all of Gladwin County and remove the sliver of Clare County and put them in District 94
Lisa McGaugh
Keeping Midland County wholly represented is just as it should be. Logical and appropriate. I fully support this map.
Michael McGaugh
I fully support this map. It keeps Midland and Midland County together and is best designed to handle the specific local challenges of the area.
James H. Gurnee
I support this map! Keeps Midland/Midland county together to handle specific local challenges! This is great!
Jennifer Gurnee
This map makes a lot of sense. In full support!
Richard Cesaretti
Keeping Midland County together makes much more sense. Thank you!
Jill Thill
Thank you for keeping Midland County whole.
Jill Thill
Thank you for keeping Midland County whole.
Catherine A Macomber
I support this map with reservations. I believe northern Bay county has more in common with the rest of the Watershed. The Saginaw Bay, fed by the associated rivers, has the potential to create flooding, power outages, and access barriers similar to those in southern Bay county. I think this should be taken into consideration.
Dennis Quehl
I have been waiting for a map that has some common sense to it regarding community of interest. My dad said common sense is uncommon. Unfortunately there has been a lot of maps recently like 208 through 210 that seem to be politically motivated by taking a slice sideways and tearing apart Midland from Midland County. This map makes sense to us in the Midland area. Thank you for a map that ACTUALLY appears to based on community of interest and not motivated by political concerns. Thank you for a nonpartisan map that makes common sense.
Natalie Gingras Hazen
Yes!
Mary J Quehl
FINALLY A STATEHOUSE MAP THAT APPEARS TO BE MORE BASED ON COMMUNITY OF INTEREST. This map makes sense to us in the Midland area. Thank you for a map that ACTUALLY appears to based on community of interest and not motivated by political concerns. Thank you for a nonpartisen map that makes common sense.
Aaron Majorana
This is a good map, it keeps Midland whole and provides a unified voice for flood recovery. Thank you!
Mike Scott
Strong like on this map. Keeps Midland County whole!
Michelle Smith
LIKE this map- this makes sense and keeps Midland and Gladwin interests for flood recovery and watershed. This is great for Midland and Central Michigan, thank you
Matthew J Smith
LIKE this map- this makes sense and keeps Midland and Gladwin interests for flood recovery and watershed. This is great for Midland and Central Michigan, thank you
Jesseca Elza
Thank you for recognizing our community interests.
Dawn Bartell
This statehouse map makes perfect sense
RODNEY KLOHA
This Statehouse map makes perfect sense. Thank you for recognizing keeping the City of Midland with the County of Midland supports the important requirement of communities of interest.
jane scott
This map is great! Keeps County of Midland and City of Midland whole! We work together all the time on shared issues! Thanks so much!
David Kepler
This Map as it relates to District 31, reflects a community of interest, that is linked through the watershed the exists in that district, as well as the economic and social connections
Joseph Lunsford
This Statehouse map makes perfect sense.
Doreen F Starner
Perfect - kept Midland County whole and understood the importance of flood recovery and interest of people in Midland and Gladwin counties.
Jennifer Majorana
This map is logical and makes sense. It harmonizes into one district communities of interest of Midland and Gladwin for flood recovery and watershed management; as well as the agricultural community of interest that benefits from representation that understands the importance of agriculture here in Midland and Central Michigan. Thank you, Commission!
Daniel Grams
I can't believe you are actually going to present this map to the public. The configurations of districts make no logical sense, even with VRA considerations. The reality is that you've created ugly looking districts that would have voted the same whether packed or not. At least a person would be representing a defined community. Now you have these narrow strips of district encompassing several communities...divided communities all over the place. For what purpose...to please the social scientists and their ivory tower gobbly gook?? I hope the 2nd round of public comments will lead you to make significant changes to this map. You've taken what should be simple and made it unnecessarily complex. I don't think this is the product that voters had in mind in 2018 when they created this commission.
Daniel Harris
Well, all of the State House maps have been extremely messy but especially compared to Versions 4, 5, and 6 released today, this one is the least bad.
Lisa
This map is absurd; Metro Detroit looks like a jigsaw puzzle. Will look worse after the changes today; such as Taylor and Monroe in a district. Start over and do things correctly please. I note that commenters from Detroit were also highly unhappy with the maps during the public comments at today's meeting. There are ways to get VRA compliance without destroying everyone's community representation. Local Reps for local communities!