My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
10-06-2021 HD v1 RAS
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Joshua Schriver
Move these (2) Oxford Twp Precincts with the rest of Oxford and Addison Twp in MI46. They share one non-partisan community of interest in their single, shared school system.
Lisa
Why after many, many displeased comments on all the previous maps, have you not corrected these egregious districts that serve to dilute the voices of Pontiac voters and other communities as well? The residents of these communities will not accept the "it's too much work" answer. Commenters from Lake Orion, Oxford, Clarkston, Independence Township, Waterford, Auburn Hills, Bloomfield and Pontiac have all stated that these districts do not preserve COIs and do not represent the communities involved in any way. Fix this!
Conner
This district is a good start! The I-94 corridor is a critical COI, and this map helps partisan fairness. It could be better and more compact if you draw it like this: https://www.michigan-mapping.org/submission/p6057 40% of Jackson votes for Democrats, so it should have at least 1 competitive or lean-D district between its state house, state senate, and Congressional maps. You're on the right track!
Timothy L Cross
I can not believe you have split Muskegon County into 4 different State House Districts. This is ridiculous. We have gone from two to four. You should keep communities of interest together. This is crazy.
Jack Bengtsson
try tweaking map #193, it's much better map. Not happy with
Kent County
Lisa
Map still stinks. Metro Detroit is sliced and diced into an unrecognizable mess. Western Michigan is also getting ripped apart. Communities and COIs are ignored. There is a better way to comply with the regulations that will keep communities whole and create fair and adequately represented districts. This map is good for no one.
Catherine A Macomber
I support this map with reservations. I believe that the consideration of the northern part of Bay county as a community of interest affiliated with the Watershed that includes Saginaw Bay is important.
Drew Jones
The maps the commission is making in West Michigan area awful. Start doing your research on communities that belong together. Grabbing population just because is a ridiculous way to make a map. Do better! This map, plus the one actively being drawn has 3 different seats put into a small suburb area. Keep it whole
Bonnie Jill Haver-Crissman
I agree with Jennifer Austin -- Fair Maps are paramount. I have been lobbying for a simple Midland County House District for better representation without ever imagining that Midland could be drawn into a competitive district!
Please take the time to look at and consider the maps the AFL-CIO have drawn. This is not to disparage the work you have drawn -- with you we have all learned a lot but now is not the time for ego. Your efforts are admirable. Thank you.
Portal I.D. p3621
https://miaflcio.org/fairmaps/
Jennifer Austin
I'm torn on this map. I would love to see districts more compact and square. I would love to see COIs kept together. And I would love to see House districts that aren't spread out so candidates don't have to travel as much to talk to voters and concerns are more centralized around an area. At the same time, partisan fairness is the most important factor as far as I am concerned. We have had maps that decided how our legislature was made up for decades. Republicans gerrymandered so badly that even though there were a majority of voters who voted for Democrats, the Republicans held minority rule. That has to end. We need maps that achieve as close to zero political bias as possible and if that means my district is shaped like a bone then so be it. We can't all have what we want. The most important thing right now is to have a legislature that works for the people, not the extreme portions of their party. If the state house and senate are evenly split, then maybe they will be forced to compromise in Lansing and we can have good governance in this state.