My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
011824_V4_HD_Col
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Christopher Gilmer Hill
This is a much better COI than putting Harper Woods with Eastpointe. Eastpointe and Harper Woods have almost nothing in common aside from race, and there's no constitutional justification for packing them together; this map preserves their voices in separate seats. The COI boundaries are obvious just from zooming in on the borders: the boundary between Harper Woods and Grosse Pointe Woods cuts through the middle of diverse residential neighborhoods whose residents live and work in both cities, while the boundary between Harper Woods and Eastpointe cuts through a gas station and an Applebee's Parking Lot
Gerianne LaPratt
Keeping Harper Woods with the Grosse Pointes would keep our Senate district together. With maps that include us with Eastpointe and Detroit, there are 3 Senate districts. Also, precincts 5 & 6 in Harper Woods are part of the Grosse Pointe School District.
Other reasons to keep Harper Woods in District 10: Harper Woods, Grosse Pointe Shores and Grosse Pointe Woods, and St. Clair Shores share the Milk River InterCounty Drain District and a pump station (waste processing) and the 3 of us cities have representatives on the Board for that. We all have the same flooding issues we are trying to resolve. Grosse Pointe and Harper Woods share public services, including mutual fire and police aid.
Robert Dindoffer
This configuration is not my preference for a few reasons:
(1) It is not as good as other configurations at maintaining the Lake St. Clair suburbs COI. Other configurations keep it simple with St. Clair Shores and the Grosse Pointes being the essence of the district. That better configuration would result in candidates being required to address protection of the lake and water/sewage infrastructure as a top priority;
(2) I think placing one precinct from Cornerstone Village in the District breaks up the Cornerstone-East English Village-Morningside COI that has received substantial support in public comment. This is an unneccessary community split.
(3) Similarly, splitting up St. Clair Shores three ways in this configuration is not necessary, if Harper Woods is not included. Or, if only precincts from Harper Woods that are in the Grosse Pointe Schools are included.
This is tough, because either (a) St. Clair Shores is split 3 ways; (b) Harper Woods gets split (or not included); or (c) the Grosse Pointes will be broken-up. I think the option that minimizes the number of communities being broken-up is the best option.
Note - I had advocated for the Grosse Pointes plus Detroit Riverfront District that was ultimately struck down by the Courts. So that is not an option any longer.
Fay Al-Asir
If district 3 must be changed, This is a good configuration for Districts 3 & 15, However I would like to see Melvindale added back to District 3 as it was originally. This is much better than the alternative plans that split up much of Dearborn Heights from Dearborn.
Vivian M Sawicki
The configuration of District 10 on this map is very good. It keeps the community of Harper Woods joined with our traditional community partner of the Grosse Pointes and St. Clair Shores. Our communities have many shared services, including a school district, police/fire dispatch services, a water treatment service (Milk River), and pumping stations. In addition, the size is appropriate to the target goal that the redistricting commission has set.