My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
012324_v1_HD_Tulip
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
JANET BURKE
This map appears to be non-compliant with the VRA. It also demonstrates partisan bias.
Brenda Grace Shufelt
This redistricting map is splitting up a minority Community and is likely not in compliance with the Voting Rights Act
Victor A Jimenez
This map is a butchering of the southwest detroit community and there is no way any version that destroys the collective power of such a historically and culturally important neighborhood of this city can ever be considered
Ryan Reese
The packing problem seen in the Bergamot maps is exacerbated here. Any attempts to 'fix' the problem are just made worse the moment that one looks at the VRA and compression data.
Very little about this map is good. So much is problematic that we would be here all week going over the details.
Nomi Joyrich
This map changes too many districts
Nomi Joyrich
This map has very few Black Opportunity Districts.
Nomi Joyrich
This map has no partisan fairness. Hate this map.
Jason Dougherty
The new District 10 and District 11 map disregards the fact that the Grosse Pointes and Harper Woods have always been connected economically, socially, and politically. Residents shop in the same areas, share a portion of the GP school district, and have similar political concerns.
Joe Hunt
Agree with prior comment on gerrymandering that it bears repeating "Districts 5 and 6 on this map continue the illegal racist gerrymander that was overturned by the court. This map should be abandoned."
Sydney LaDuke
I like that this proposed map keeps the neighborhood of East English Village (Cadieux --> E. Outer Drive/Whittier and Mack --> Harper) intact.
Chris Roosen
Districts 5 and 6 on this map continue the illegal racist gerrymander that was overturned by the court. This map should be abandoned.
Lori Stone
Warren is the third largest city in Michigan, this maps creates districts that provide adequate representation for the community.
Kristine McLonis
It appears that portions of Oak Park are in a district separate from that of Huntington Woods. Both of these cities have a strong Jewish population and should be considered a community of interest. I do like that Ferndale, Pleasant Ridge, Hazel Park, and most of Madison Heights are in the same proposed district.
Anthony Scannell
Splits up SW Detroit COI..
Vivian M Sawicki
This configuration disregards the long-standing and traditional COI existing between the cities of Harper Woods, Grosse Pointe Woods, and St. Clair Shores. Our cities share not only a water and sewer disposal and treatment system, but also share city services, a portion of a school district, and similar concerns and issues. This map would disregard that relationship.
Daniel Aubrey
I agree with district 13 as northeast Warren associates and has similar concerns & communities of interest with Eastern Warren, Northern Roseville, and northern St. Clair Shores.
Robert Dindoffer
I generally prefer this configuration for District 10 because it reflects the Lakeshore Suburbs COI better than other configurations. The other configurations split St. Clair Shores 3 ways, thereby splitting up the COI.
The one precinct from Harper Woods is ok to include in the sense that that precinct is part of the Grosse Pointe School District, so it has some connection to the Grosse Pointes. A better solution would be to use an additional precinct from St. Clair Shores out of District 62, if additional population is needed at-all.