My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
012424_V2_HD_COL_Trillium IPPSR
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Kristine McLonis
All of Oak Park should be in the same district as Huntington Woods, since both cities have a significant Jewish population. The entirety of both cities should be considered a community of interest.
I’m wondering why not all of Madison Heights is included in this proposed map of the 7th district.
Vivian M Sawicki
This map does keep the long-standing COI between Harper Woods, Grosse Pointe Woods and Shores, and St. Clair Shores. Those communities share the Milk River InterCounty Drain District and a pump station (waste processing) and Board representatives. So we all have the same water and environmental issues. We all have the same flooding issues we are trying to resolve. Grosse Pointe and Harper Woods share public services, including mutual fire and police aid and animal control. Harper Woods is part of the Grosse Pointe Chamber of Commerce. This map supports long-standing and traditional COI and allows for our joint efforts in representation
Daniel Aubrey
I do not prefer this district 14 proposal as it inappropriately associates Northeast Warren and Southwest Warren without Northwest or Southeast Warren. This is quite gerrymandered and don’t feel concerns or communities of interest would be at aligned and would be at odds or differ. This PAC plan is simply a one sided map and should not be considered as it generally doesn’t make sense especially in many other district that the committee has learned over the years of which neighborhoods or communities have been voiced. Very sus plan.