My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
012524_V3_HD_COL_Water_Lily
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Brenda Shufelt
This Redistricting Map is likely not in Compliance with the Voting Rights Act. It would also tip the scale in favor of one Political Party.
Ryan Reese
This map demonstrates every problem with not crossing the 8 mile boundary. While symbolically the boundary exists, realistically the data does not show this. The population of people that I live next to and work among are demonstrably similar to the population just south in 8 mile. The hard boundary of Water Lily, resulting in too few opportunity districts and a badly representative structure, simply shows us why this is no longer a viable way of looking at the districting issue if we want to ensure fairness for all Detroit citizens.
lori A Boyce
Likely not VRA compliant and also, is unfair from a partisan perspective. Partisan fairness should get better with new maps, not worse. I oppose this map for these and other reasons.
Nomi Joyrich
This map has very few Black Opportunity districts
Nomi Joyrich
This map is very unfair. it has no partisan fairness
Jason Dougherty
The new District 10 and District 11 map overlooks the fact that the Grosse Pointes and Harper Woods have always been connected economically, socially, and politically. Residents shop in the same areas, share a portion of the GP school district, and have similar political concerns.
Joe Hunt
This is the best map. I lobby for approval
Sydney LaDuke
I like that this proposed map keeps the neighborhood of East English Village (Cadieux --> E. Outer Drive/Whittier and Mack --> Harper) intact. I really like that this map keeps the 3 neighborhoods of East English Village, Cornerstone Village, and Morningside together in one district.
Lori Stone
Warren is the third largest city in Michigan, this maps creates districts that provide adequate representation for the community.
dina shargabian
This map leans too far Republican to respect partisan fairness
Kristine McLonis
I’m glad to see that Huntington Woods and almost all of Oak Park are in the same proposed district in this map. They comprise a community of interest due to the sizeable Jewish population in each city.
Unlike most of the other proposed maps, the district in which Ferndale is placed doesn’t extend at all below the 8 Mile border. That disappoints me; but I do believe that Ferndale, Pleasant Ridge, Hazel Park, and Madison Heights (most of which is in the same proposed district) comprise a community of interest.
Gerianne LaPratt
Please consider the COA, Harper Woods and the Grosse Pointes, especially Grosse Pointe Woods. The amount of services we share is immense. Not only do we share a school district, the Milk River Water, emergency services, etc, we share the HELM which services all the seniors in the 6 cities.
Daniel Grams
How are Birmingham and Oak Park a COI? Why are Farmington Hills and Southfield when they could almost be intact as districts on their own? Common sense...the commission seems to be lacking it even after all these years and millions of tax payer dollars.
Vivian M Sawicki
The City of Harper Woods should be connected to the cities of Grosse Pointe Woods and St. Clair Shores because we have natural and long-standing community connections that include water districts, city services, school districts and community interests and concerns. This map ignores the traditional COI existing in these communities.
Robert Dindoffer
I like this configuration. It keeps the lakeshore COI together by keeping the Grosse Pointes and St. Clair Shores together and without splitting them up across multiple districts (except for the pre-existing St. Clair Shores Split).