My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
011824_V4_HD_COL_Bergamont2 - Lakeshore
Loading geometries...
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
JANET BURKE
This map is not VRA compliant and appears to have partisan bias.
Ryan Reese
Map is not VRA complaint, just like the previous variant. The use of the hard boundary at 8 mile does not reflect demographic shifts of the last several decades. Only 10 Opportunity districts demonstrates VRA lack of compliance. The packing is obvious in districts adjacent to the proposed Gross Point waterfront district.
lori A Boyce
Likely not VRA compliant. Definitely not partisan fair. These are two extremely important factors.
Nomi Joyrich
This map does not have very many Black Opportunity Districts
Nomi Joyrich
This map does not have partisan fairness
Sydney LaDuke
I do not like that this map splits up the Cornerstone Village neighborhood into 2 districts. East English Village, Morningside, and Cornerstone are all part of one community along the E. Warren corridor.
Vivian M Sawicki
This map does keep the long-standing COI between Harper Woods, Grosse Pointe Woods and Shores, and St. Clair Shores together, which is good. However, this map cuts the community of Grosse Pointe Park in half, which would disrupt our joint efforts in representation. The Grosse Pointe Communities and Harper Woods are small cities on the far Eastside of Wayne County with multiple overlapping interests and traditional concerns. A better map keeps these small communities together along with a portion of St. Clair Shores, a natural configuration.
james ward leyerle
Splitting Royal Oak Township---shameful. Speaking of splitting COI...
Robert Dindoffer
I do not prefer this district configuration for several reasons. First, it dillutes the Lakeshore Suburbs COI but cutting out St. Clair Shores residents and adding Harper Woods residents, who don't have the same connection to the lake. Second, it breaks up Cornerstone Village, which has its own COI with East English Village and Morningside.