My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
012924_V1_HD_COL_Daisy_2 FC
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Brenda Shufelt
With so much focus on Race and strong reliance on 2022 boundaries, this does not change the districts enough to meet the changes requested by the Court.
Ryan Reese
While the VRA indicates a greater number of opportunity districts in comparison to my preferred map, my primary concern is that this map appears to continue the set of rubrics that ultimately led to the maps being reconsidered in the first place.
Basically, I don't think this map would ever pass muster, and so should not be considered.
Nomi Joyrich
Impacts the fewest districts
Nomi Joyrich
Good number of Black Opportunity Districts
Joe Hunt
The worse of all the maps. Districts 5 6 7 1 13 12 have smidgeons of south Baseline representation while Districts 4 and 8 look like splotches. Could be called the Tetris map
Sydney LaDuke
I do not like that this map continues to divide my neighborhood of East English Village (Cadieux --> E. Outer Drive/Whittier and Mack --> Harper). My neighbors and I protested this with the original re-districting proposal and still strongly disagree with splitting up our strong, stable neighborhood into two districts!
Chris Roosen
Another bad map that continues the illegal practices that were already thrown out by the courts. Districts 5 and 6 are particularly egregious. District 8 is lacks compactness and any rationale for its shape. The City of Warren is broken into too many districts. Keep dilluting the Detroit vote like this, will get sued again and again.
Chris Roosen
Another bad map that continues the illegal practices that were already thrown out by the courts. Districts 5 and 6 are particularly egregious. District 8 is lacks compactness and any rationale for its shape. The City of Warren is broken into too many districts. Keep dilluting the Detroit vote like this, will get sued again and again.
George Higgins
This map does not comply with the guidelines because it inherits the same district boundaries in the maps that were struck down. It is likely not VRA compliant and should not be chosen because it is doubtful the court will accept it compared to other maps.
Lori Stone
Warren is the third largest city in Michigan, this maps creates districts that provide adequate representation for the community.
Kristine McLonis
I like that Ferndale, Pleasant Ridge, Hazel Park, and Madison Heights are in the same district with this map. A portion of Huntington Woods is also part of that district; it should be with the rest of that city in District 6. Both Huntington Woods and Oak Park have a strong Jewish population and should be considered a community of interest.
Juli Wilson
Van Buren Twp, as an anchor of the I-94 corridor between Ann Arbor, Willow Run Airport, and DTW and therefore a significant portion of the extended Detroit metropolitan commercial area, should not be included with rural areas that include farming communities such as Maybee and Oakville. Our community interests in VBT are more in line with those of Ypsilanti Twp and Canton. I feel placing Belleville and VBT into (primarily rural) District 31 will not provide representation that is supportive of our more urban character and identity.
Vivian M Sawicki
This map completely disregards the long-standing COI between Harper Woods, Grosse Pointe Woods and Shores, and St. Clair Shores. Those communities share the Milk River InterCounty Drain District and a pump station (waste processing) and Board representatives. We all have the same water and environmental issues and have the same flooding issues we are trying to resolve. In addition, Grosse Pointe and Harper Woods share public services, including mutual fire and police aid and animal control. Harper Woods is part of the Grosse Pointe Chamber of Commerce and shares a portion of the school district. This map disregards that long-standing and traditional COI and would disrupt our joint efforts in representation.