My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
01_26_24_V4_HD_RAS
Loading geometries...
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Gregory Clark
I am not in favor of this redraw. It goes far beyond what one would consider reasonable in the number of districts it changes beyond what the Commission was ordered to consider. Splitting the Grosse Pointes and the lakefront communities is hardly putting "Communities Of Interest" high on the list of priorities and the Pointes share much infrastructure today (which will likely increase in the future). Reject this map.
Brian Curson
This map is not just redrawing the districts listed by the court; it is a brand new map. I live in 16 and every other map keeps 16 more or less intact. This map shrinks 16 and kicks many residents into new districts. This map is an overreach and should be rejected.
Richard Michalski
This Plan appears to increase the scope of the redistricting far beyond what the Court mandated.
George Higgins
What this map does is far beyond the scope of the mandate given by the court. It changes districts beyond what could be deemed reasonably necessary by any reasonable person. This is not a map drawn to remedy the issues found by the court. This is an altogether different district map. The commission should not select this map. It splits Warren many times over but in ways that do not meaningfully advance the represenatation of any COI. District 13 in this example is a poor substitute for district 11 in other maps as it advances too far north to create a good opportunity district.
lori A Boyce
Court mandate was to redraw the boundaries of additional districts is limited to the Court’s Order to redraw additional districts “as reasonably necessary” to provide the remedy of redrawing districts D1, D7, D8, D10, D11, D12 and D14. This map goes so far beyond the direction of the court and would be extremely disruptive (and unnecessarily so) to a large number of districts. I strongly oppose this map for this and other reasons.
Kristine McLonis
As chair of the Ferndale Area Democrats which serves both Ferndale and Pleasant Ridge, I am not in favor of having Pleasant Ridge in a different district from Ferndale. Although in terms of economic demographics, it may make more sense for Pleasant Ridge to be in the same district as Huntington Woods and Royal Oak. (And I do realize that the point of redistricting isn’t to maintain the structure of political party clubs.) Oak Park and Huntington Woods are separated into the 5th and 6th Districts respectively. Both cities have a strong Jewish population -- they should be considered a community of interest and kept in the same district.
Vivian M Sawicki
The City of Harper Woods is in an interesting position because we are one of only six small communities in the far east side of Wayne County. For this reason, we have a long history of cooperation between the cities of the Grosse Pointes. We have particular COI with Grosse Pointe Woods and Shores and with St. Clair Shores and have a broad range of interests with those communities. There is really no cooperative efforts with Eastpointe. The Regent Park portion of Detroit has had some interaction with our community and has developed some relationship in our efforts toward safety issues. This map is not ideal for our representative efforts