My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
020124_V2_HD_COL Willow FC
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Brenda Shufelt
As others have pointed out in their comments, this map is way too partisan
Ryan Reese
Possibly the worst of 9 maps. Plain and Simple: Non-wave election cycles does not demonstrate a 50.2/49.8 split in District 10 but a much more RNC favorable district. An active effort is being made in this map to ensure that inconsistent community representation is occurring, splitting up communities such as Warren and Center Line, to the point where the communities have their votes diluted. A nearly RNC leaning district is fabricated from whole-cloth where none should demographically exist, damaging partisan fairness more than necessary. 12 opportunity districts are created, but the separations seem designed to reduce overall CoI coverage. Honestly, this is a terrible map, and the only person who I could see viewing it positively is someone specifically bent on increasing partisan representation in favor of a specific party at this time, and is carefully using math to get away with it.
lori A Boyce
This map creates too great a Republican advantage. It is not a fair map. This is inconsistent with the goals of the constitutional amendment. This is worse than what we have now, which is also unfair --- the committee should be able to do better.
Cara Cryderman
I have been a Harper Woods resident for many years now, and I find this map completely inappropriate for the community’s shared history with Grosse Pointe. Frankly, Harper Woods and Grosse Pointe belong together.
My fiancee is from Grosse Pointe, and we bought our first home together in Harper Woods to be close to his parents, and for continued access to the Grosse Pointe public school system. Many of our neighbors have done the same. It’s created a unified community feel between HW and the Grosse Pointe area.
Many of us live in Harper Woods and work in Grosse Pointe, and vice versa. We also share many public services like fire and EMS, and have similar environmental issues when it comes to flooding. They are also both Wayne County communities. Eastpointe is a completely different community and has different issues than we do in Grosse Pointe and Harper Woods, and this maps dilutes their representation too. Please vote down this map and keep Harper Woods and Grosse Pointe together.
Nomi Joyrich
This map totally sucks. It has no partisan fairness.
Jason Dougherty
The new District 10 and District 11 map overlooks the fact that the Grosse Pointes and Harper Woods have always been connected economically, socially, and politically. Residents shop in the same areas, share a portion of the GP school district, and have similar political concerns.
Joe Hunt
Terrible example of a compact map. My Warren district 14 crosses into both Oakland and Wayne counties. Rejected for crossing multiple county lines.
Sydney LaDuke
I like that this proposed map keeps the neighborhood of East English Village (Cadieux --> E. Outer Drive/Whittier and Mack --> Harper) intact. I really like that this proposal keeps the 3 Detroit neighborhoods of East English Village, Cornerstone Village, and Morningside intact. We are all part of the same community along the E. Warren corridor.
Lori Stone
Warren is the third largest city in Michigan this map cracks Warren into 4 districts and it is unclear if Warren would have a majority representation in ANY of the districts
Richard Michalski
I think Willlow is a good balanced plan that offers advantages compared to the other plans. I support it for three reasons. #1 - The number of districts that have Black > White voter populations is higher (at 12) than most other plans. The only other one with 12 is Daisy 2. #2 - the number of VERY competitive (Republican vs Democrat) districts is 3 (proposed districts 10, 22 and 62). The other plans that have 3 include Bergamot 1, Tulip, Water Lily and Riverwalk. Those 4 do not offer the benefit of 12 B>W districts. As a Progressive, this actually helps the Republican position slightly, but the only way we will be able to change the current bitter politics is to have more competitive districts that drive middle-of-the-road politics. (See my attachment). #3 - Using a nonscientific measure for gerrymandering, the map appears to have minimal zigs and zags compared to some other plans. I do not know how the plan is regarding COI, but others will surely comment on that.
Cheryl Rottmann
As Clerk of Madison Heights, this splits our small community into 3 districts - confusing and not necessary.
dina shargabian
This map creates too great a Republican advantage. It is not a fair map.
Kristine McLonis
In this map, the proposed 7th District groups Ferndale, Pleasant Ridge, Hazel Park, and part of Madison Heights together with part of northwest Detroit (including the University District). I like that it sticks with the “bacon strip” model of combining a portion of Wayne County and southern Oakland County together. However, Madison Heights should not be split in two.
Another downside of this proposed map is that Oak Park and Huntington Woods are separated into the 5th and 6th Districts respectively. Both cities have a strong Jewish population and should be considered a community of interest.
(I’m also not happy about the prospect of two or more of our current state representatives having to run against each other for the 7th District in the August primary.)
Joseph Fresard
reflects the COI input submitted
Joshua Brandon
You split Madison Heights into 3 sections. And Hazel Park shouldn't be with Ferndale. This map is not good for keeping "like" communities together.
Lizzy Metry
This is good district for my community.
Erin
This district is Excellent. It perfectly reflects the community that we have in St. Clair Shores and the Grosse Pointes. I am a native of St. Clair Shores, where I first lived as a child, but I have lived in Grosse Pointe Woods, and Grosse Pointe Park. I can tell you from living in the area, there there no combination that our communities cross-over in many ways and, of course, we are connected by our lakeshore.
I love this district.
Robert Dindoffer
This map does a Great Job reflecting the Community of Interest between St. Clair Shores and the Grosse Pointes.
Vivian M Sawicki
This map completely disregards the long-standing COI between Harper Woods, Grosse Pointe Woods and Shores, and St. Clair Shores. Those communities share the Milk River InterCounty Drain District and a pump station (waste processing) and Board representatives. So we all have the same water and environmental issues. We all have the same flooding issues we are trying to resolve. In addition, Grosse Pointe and Harper Woods share public services, including mutual fire and police aid and animal control. Harper Woods is part of the Grosse Pointe Chamber of Commerce and shares a portion of the school district. This map disregards that long-standing and traditional COI and would disrupt our joint efforts in representation.