My Districting | MICHIGAN
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
051524_SD_COL_V2 Crane
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
Comment Toggle
All Comments
Red
Yellow
Green
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Census Legend
Labels visible at zoom level 10.
Labels visible at zoom level 13.
Labels visible at zoom level 15.
Labels visible at zoom level 17.
Current Map Zoom: 8
2020 Census PL 94.171 Data
Loading...
Number of Comments Displayed (Zoom in to show less): 0
Alex Garza
This map splits the city of Taylor in Downriver yet again. First, the city of Taylor was split into two different districts in the State House map redistricting, now it is split into two districts with this map. Please consider the ramifications this has for the people of the city of Taylor when making decisions like this, and segmenting a community in this way. This map is a disservice to our community as a whole.
Lauren Lisi
Again you are splitting Warren and this map does not have good partisan fairness scores.
Claire S Vial
this map isolates Royal Oak and Ferndale to limit Democratic influence. It attempts to make surrounding districts advantageous for Republicans
Carrie Hatcher-Kay
Commissioners, PLEASE do NOT consider Crane!! This is crazy, the opposite of the intention or spirit of the whole idea of redistricting. This comes no where close to partisan fairness.
Sarah Abbott
This Crane map accomplishes the protection of the many COIs that have #ShownUp. It is also very favorable in the lower criteria on the Michigan State Constitution's ranked criteria (which matter the most). This is a good map.
Deq Martin
better then the other maps
Al Abdou
This is another map that actually values communities of interest. communities of interest is most important.
Darryl Conliffe
This map pairs Oakland County cities Farmington & Farmington Hills with far flung areas. Poor for COI.
Katherine olsson
this map does not protect communities of interest. Warren, for example, needs to stay together. Not enough partisan fairness.
Chaldean Voices Matter
Cardinal is number 1 choice for the Chaldean Community but this map is also acceptable commissioners! :)
Taaha Najam
The Crane map should be disregarded. This map lacks
partisanship fairness and does not have the best interests of communities of color in mind.
Omar Jazaerly
The Crane map fails to protect communities of interest, as it splits up Warren. The votes of Black, Asian, and Muslim communities in Warren should be safeguarded by keeping the city intact.
Taaha Najam
The Crane map should be disregarded. This map lacks
partisanship fairness and does not have the best interests of communities of color in mind.
Judithe Stone
Significantly worse mean-median difference score than Heron. And a worse efficiency gap score than Heron. This map has fewer opportunities for Black representation, a worse efficiency gap score than the Heron map. This map is worse than the status quo--defeats the purpose of redistricting. REJECT THIS MAP
Wendy Steadman
This map is worse than the Linden map in all aspects. It has fewer opportunities for black voters. It has a terrible partisan fairness score.
Ralph Johnson
Crane is not bad, although not the best, in terms of fairness and should be at least considered.
Karen Holman
This comes close to good representation of communities.
Germaine Pentsil
I think this map should absolutely be considered. This seems to be the only map that correctly displays proposed districts without being unconstitutional.
Hafsa Azam
The Crane map is terrible for protecting communities of interest. It splits up Warren, and Warren deserves to be kept together to protect the vote of Black and Asian communities.
Yousif Kaakarli
The Crane map is not good for protecting communities of interest. Black, Asian, and Muslim communities in Warren will potentially be disenfranchised as the city is carved up. Please disregard this map.
Lynna Kaucheck
This is not a fair map. It's partisan fairness score is too low. Please reject this map.
Hibah Khan
The Crane map has a very low partisan fairness score. Please do not consider this map for further deliberation.
Robert Piper
This map disenfranchises voters of color and has a low partisan fairness score.
Laurie Krauth
This has a very bad partisan fairness score, and it's much worse than Linden, the status quo. There are very few opportunities for non-white representation.
Linda Kahn Gale
Please do not choose this map. It has a low partisan fairness even even worse than Linden. It gives few opportunities for non white representation
Claudia Kraus Piper
This map has a low partisan fairness score. There is less opportunity for representation for communities of color. It is worse than the status quo.
Emily Jernberg
This map is a problem. It's a low partisan fairness score. It cuts up Warren, thus disenfranchising black voters. Please don't vote for this map.
Emily Jernberg
This is a bad map. This is a very partisan map. Warren is also a problem and gets cut up, thus disenfranchising black voters. Please don't vote for this map.
Lisa F Peers
This map is too broad and doesn't represent the Birmingham community well. Please do not use this map.
Chaldean Voices Matter
This is a very good map for the Chaldean community in district 9!
Eve Mokotoff
This is a terribly partisan map- it's not the point of doing this work in the first place-although collaboratively written it is not fair to voters and should not be selected.
Cory Joyrich
This map features a bad partisan fairness score and it breaks apart communities of interest (i.e., Warren). Do not use.
Leora Druckman
Very poor partisan fairness. Reconsider and create a new one. Not at all in the spirit of what this redistricting is intended to do.
Pam Shore
This map carves up Warren and disenfranchises black voters.
Anna Kristina Johnson
The Crane map doesn't reflect partisan fairness and should not be considered.
Tim Sawmiller
Fails at communities of interest and partisan fairness
Daniel Grams
This map is the best of the collaborative maps. It keeps Troy, Rochester, & Rochester Hills together along with the far western portion of Sterling Heights. These communities share many commonalities and currently configured into a Senate District.
Connecting Pontiac and Southfield brings together to communities with strong African American communities. This makes much better sense than connecting Pontiac with Rochester (as the cardinal map does.) This strengthens the voting power of African Americans in Oakland county.
I also like this map because it keeps Livonia basically whole and joins it with Farmington/Farmington Hills. These are similar communities...and the commission has done Livonia wrong on most of its map for Senate and House by dividing it and splitting it and baconstripping it into Detroit.
The only thing that does not make sense with this map is drawing Southgate into District 1.
Overall, this map retains several politically competitive State Senate District in the metro Detroit area. Many of the other maps seem to take away those politically competitive seats to the advantage of the Democratic party. True partisan fairness does not favor one party over the other. Redrawing the Metro-Detroit maps to remove politically competitive seats is not a change for the better.
Brian L Burnett
Good for my district, but lousy for the state. Please delete.
Rena Seltzer
The map has an even worse partisan fairness score than the current map, and should not be considered.
Rena Seltzer
This map's partisan fairness score is even worse than what we have now. It is definitely a step in the wrong direction.
Shannon Falkenhagen
I dislike this map. It does not have partisan fairness and lacks representation of people of color.
Lauren Lisi
I do not think this is a good map in terms of partisan fairness.
Yousif Y.
Thank you for this map commissioners! This map is the best map for the Chaldean Communities. Please choose this one as the final map. Thanks again commissioners for all your hard work!
james ward leyerle
not sure adding SE Oakland with W. Warren makes sense.
Violet E. Anderson
This map does not represent any of the communities or neighborhoods for fairness and should not be used. It is not a fair voting area.
Nomi Joyrich
One of the absolute worst maps for partisan fairness and for opportunities for non-white representation. Carves up Warren.
Shadia Martini
Please reject this map. It is not an improvement on our current one.
Allegra Pitera
Crane has 2 VRA Districts and a pretty low partisan fairness score.
Deborah Kraus
Other than preference for the Chaldean community, which I support, this map doesn't maintain partisan fairness.
Douglas Floto
This map is a good fit for Commerce Twp. It does not split up the township and it more closely aligns us with our community of interest: suburban Detroit.
Allen Ralph Wolf
This map is one of the worst for partisan fairness. It should be rejected.
Jonathan T Weinberg
This is not the worst map under consideration, but it still appears to be a step backwards from the Linden map.
Frances E Chudnow
This map does not reflect partisan fairness and is not good for my community.
LAURIE KIMMEL
This map doesn't reflect my neighborhood's makeup.
Elizabeth Buckner
this map is not fair to all parties, and does not address the needs of black communities. This does not have fair partisan fairness.
john leon
Please don't vote for this map, it seems to be a very biased, partisan map.
Shelia A.B.
Thank you for respecting the chaldean community with this map. Unlike others that almost seem to intentionally destroy the chaldean voice, this map respects it. thank you
Virginia Preuss
This map does not maintain partisan fairness. Please do not select this map.
Nomi Joyrich
Please do not adopt this map. It does not have partisan fairness and it's not good for my community.
Sherry LB Trezise
Please remember that We, the people, passed Proposal 2 to create fair statewide maps. The Constitution makes partisan fairness a priority higher than municipal lines. Changing a map ought to make it more fair, not less. This Crane map makes changes which create more partisan UNfairness. That is heading in the wrong direction! Please do not adopt this Crane map.
Chris Andrews
Crane adds to the partisan unfairness of Linden. We should be making the map fairer, not less fair. Romulus is not a COI. The Constitution makes partisan fairness a higher priority than municipal lines. We passed Prop 2 to create fair statewide maps where the party with the most votes wins the most seats and can govern.
Robert McCraight
This map is most beneficial to the residents of Romulus, as it leaves us whole. Redistricting in the House of representatives split Romulus into 3 factions leaving us with a decreased voice. Simply stated our state representatives have majority shares in other communities making Romulus less of a priority. Splitting our community again in the senate will undoubtedly have an additional negative impact on Romulus. I humbly request this commission to leave the City of Romulus whole and also leave us in district #4 with communities that have similar needs and issues as ours. Thank you for your consideration. Hopefully you will make the right decision.
Stephen Abbott
As someone who has lived in all three counties on the map i dont know if this groups peoople the right way with other people that are similar in similar areas.
Brent B
Crane is an OK map I suppose. I don't like the central macomb district, though, because it separates sterling heights from the rest of middle macomb. overall crane is fine though
Kevin Krause
This map is the best scenario for Romulus it keeps us whole and allows us to continue to work with the Senator who our citizens elected and has taken the time to get to know the issues that are specific to Romulus and hosting the DTW Airport.
Adam Sexton
Any redistricting should try best to keep cities and/or counties together. This map does a good job of separating Wayne and Macomb counties which have very different demographics, including residential and commercial priorities.